Hot Best Seller

Advanced Engineering Mathematics

Availability: Ready to download

A revision of the market leader, Kreyszig is known for its comprehensive coverage, careful and correct mathematics, outstanding exercises, helpful worked examples, and self-contained subject-matter parts for maximum teaching flexibility. The new edition provides invitations - not requirements - to use technology, as well as new conceptual problems, and new projects that fo A revision of the market leader, Kreyszig is known for its comprehensive coverage, careful and correct mathematics, outstanding exercises, helpful worked examples, and self-contained subject-matter parts for maximum teaching flexibility. The new edition provides invitations - not requirements - to use technology, as well as new conceptual problems, and new projects that focus on writing and working in teams.

*advertisement

Compare

A revision of the market leader, Kreyszig is known for its comprehensive coverage, careful and correct mathematics, outstanding exercises, helpful worked examples, and self-contained subject-matter parts for maximum teaching flexibility. The new edition provides invitations - not requirements - to use technology, as well as new conceptual problems, and new projects that fo A revision of the market leader, Kreyszig is known for its comprehensive coverage, careful and correct mathematics, outstanding exercises, helpful worked examples, and self-contained subject-matter parts for maximum teaching flexibility. The new edition provides invitations - not requirements - to use technology, as well as new conceptual problems, and new projects that focus on writing and working in teams.

30 review for Advanced Engineering Mathematics

  1. 5 out of 5

    DJ

    This book is why engineers hate math. I presume Kreyszig is the kind of man who responds to his children's questions with, "Because I'm the adult and I said so!" The exercises could have been generated by a monkey playing Mad Libs with numerals and notation; they reduce math to cold calculation and avoid any attempt at leading the student to discovery. There is no joy in this book. Regardless of what book your professor chooses, I suggest using Mary Boas' far more enjoyable (and just as rigorous) This book is why engineers hate math. I presume Kreyszig is the kind of man who responds to his children's questions with, "Because I'm the adult and I said so!" The exercises could have been generated by a monkey playing Mad Libs with numerals and notation; they reduce math to cold calculation and avoid any attempt at leading the student to discovery. There is no joy in this book. Regardless of what book your professor chooses, I suggest using Mary Boas' far more enjoyable (and just as rigorous) Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences.

  2. 4 out of 5

    Eti Mishra

    I'm using this book as well as two other books on Engineering Mathematics by B.S Grewal and Michael Greenberg. According to me this is a great book to learn D.E. and vector calculus and the book is very good as it has covered all the necessary topics with practical examples(I like this feature). But I would say if you have weak basic concepts then go for B.S Grewal and Michael Greenberg before coming on to this books as this book do not cover all the basic concepts and contains very less solved pr I'm using this book as well as two other books on Engineering Mathematics by B.S Grewal and Michael Greenberg. According to me this is a great book to learn D.E. and vector calculus and the book is very good as it has covered all the necessary topics with practical examples(I like this feature). But I would say if you have weak basic concepts then go for B.S Grewal and Michael Greenberg before coming on to this books as this book do not cover all the basic concepts and contains very less solved problem. But,Yes,everything is explained with clarity and cover a lot of advanced approaches. You can also use this book if you are preparing for Gate,but I recommend using other books as well,for better understanding,but if you don't want to brawl your brain than this book is enough.

  3. 5 out of 5

    Jeremy

    I've found this book to be a useful reference. It is not, however, a great teaching tool. It's more of a book you go to when you know exactly what you need and just can't remember the specifics off the top of your head.

  4. 4 out of 5

    Tarum

    I had a long relationship with this book in collage time. (forgot on what edition) and it was a love-hate relationship :-p

  5. 5 out of 5

    Erik

    Potentially decent reference, but joyless and uninvolving. I attempted to use it as an introduction to vector calculus and PDEs. It claims to be a comprehensive and thorough treatment of applied math, and it achieves this by way of thoroughly superficial exposition. It is everything that makes advanced math unwelcoming.

  6. 4 out of 5

    Naiyer

    I used this book time and again but as far as my opinion, ease of use and preference is concerned, I prefer the book written by Arfken and Weber. Why, even Riley and Hobson's is much better at presenting the concepts.

  7. 5 out of 5

    Moataz Ibrahim

    معايا من أولي كهربا لحد التخرج أهو. ياما فك علينا مزانق. ربنا يخليك يا عم كرايزج وينجحلك المقاصد. xD

  8. 4 out of 5

    John Fritsche

    It's great how much material is covered, but it doesn't go into very much depth. It will be a great reference manual after you've learned everything from a different book.

  9. 5 out of 5

    Maureen

    lots of details and examples. color graphics.

  10. 4 out of 5

    Amirreza Rezayan

    An extraordinary book for understanding the most complex topic of mathematic. Solving ODE and series and even Laplace transform are the topic that i enjoyed in this book.

  11. 4 out of 5

    Karam Dali

    Good book for ODE, PDE and Fourier analysis

  12. 4 out of 5

    Maaz Ali

    best

  13. 4 out of 5

    Allen

    The math content and the problem sets are challenging enough to make me feel like I'm getting my money's worth so I'm thankful for that. But the book is written to spoon-feed students and I really dislike that in a textbook. The use of bold, italic and reminders in parenthesis coupled to exclamation points is superfluous. In my opinion, sentence structure and grammar should indicate to the thoughtful reader what is important. I remember my nice, dry physics textbooks from undergrad studies being The math content and the problem sets are challenging enough to make me feel like I'm getting my money's worth so I'm thankful for that. But the book is written to spoon-feed students and I really dislike that in a textbook. The use of bold, italic and reminders in parenthesis coupled to exclamation points is superfluous. In my opinion, sentence structure and grammar should indicate to the thoughtful reader what is important. I remember my nice, dry physics textbooks from undergrad studies being more enjoyable because they made me think as I read. This math book reminds me of shallow, distracting, ADD-enhancing billboards.

  14. 5 out of 5

    Muhammad Saleem

    nothing

  15. 5 out of 5

    SYED

    i think this is the bible of maths and i m reading this book from first semester and this is my sixth semester and this is last semester in which i will read it.Although i still did not buy it but i recommend all engineering frieds to buy it because my uni had give me one copy as a prize to me haha hahaha haha haha ahaha haha ha ha

  16. 4 out of 5

    Kristine

    I like math, but I didn't like this book. I didn't like how the topics were explained and I didn't like the examples. But I guess it will come in handy if I need to look up something I've already learned.

  17. 4 out of 5

    Kevin

    Author comes across as too impressed with himself rather than properly relaying the information; thus, the practice problems are ridiculous and the explanations slim on material. I did learn Gaussian Elimination though...lol

  18. 5 out of 5

    Vegar

    Excellent mathematics book covering many topics. A must on the shelf of any engineer (and scientist?)

  19. 5 out of 5

    Bill

    A classic mathematical tome. The book Lisbeth Salander would have in her hand bag (although she would probably have a satchel).

  20. 5 out of 5

    Bishu

    slightly helpful if u are into programming competitions. helpful in general. okay okay for self-reference ...

  21. 4 out of 5

    Koon Rambo

    mmmm

  22. 5 out of 5

    Loay

    good

  23. 5 out of 5

    Alexandra

    Quite good at explaining vector calculus.

  24. 4 out of 5

    Leopold

    if u want to be advance in mathemathic n kill your self in confuse time just try to read this book slowly...

  25. 5 out of 5

    Ahmed Alkalbani

    worst mathematics book i have ever seen .. it is not a good teaching tool !!

  26. 5 out of 5

    Sheila Matamorosa

    ...

  27. 4 out of 5

    Zara Khurshid

    wana red this booook

  28. 4 out of 5

    Ali Waris

    This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. great book

  29. 4 out of 5

    Pradeep Yadav

  30. 4 out of 5

    Lizzy

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.